Ferrari 246 Dino  |  Spotted in Greenwich, Connecticut

17 likes 0 favorites
Ferrari 246 Dino spotted in Greenwich, Connecticut

Details on This Ferrari 246 Dino:

  • Location
    Greenwich, Connecticut
  • Description
    My biggest combo shot EVAR. A Jaguar XKR and a Ferrari 246 Dino GT! Lets not forget about all of those Bentleys and Aston Martins over there, and lets not forget about the Ferraris way in the back. These were on West Putnam Avenue
  • Spotted by
    Rivitography
  • Date spotted
    04/13/13
  • Tags
  • Like It? Hate It?
    Help the community by flagging poor quality images!:
  • Bookmark and Share It:
Connect with Rivitography
  • Badge
  • Spotter's rating: 51 (What's This?)
  • Offline Status
  • Last active: 12 October 2022, 18:23
Share or Post This Photo
  • Photo URL:
  • Embed code:
Comments (34 total)
Avatar
guys be honest, here are pictures online with the main subject even smaller than the Dino on this picture... If it would be any other car in front noone would say anything. That's what I mean.
Posted:  04/27/2013 13:46:16
 1 like
Avatar
Lol. I'm out!
Posted:  04/27/2013 13:41:13
 
Avatar
Oh, actually, that Cobra is not real. Then why does it deserve to be featured, Andrew?
Posted:  04/27/2013 13:36:56
 
Avatar
I hate to get into this argument. But agreed with Shane. I'm fine with combos of cars that aren't featured, but when an XKR is the main subject in the pic, and you put it under a car that's just in the back, I wouldn't consider this a good idea.
Posted:  04/27/2013 13:36:10
 4 likes
Avatar
What he meant by that was the main car in this picture is just an XKR, when in his case, he saw a REAL Cobra, which easily deserves to be featured, but it wouldn't be if he put it under Cobra.
Posted:  04/27/2013 13:31:52
 1 like
Avatar
"Maybe I did that because my photo actually deserved to be featured." This sounds a little like you think you are something better than Rivi... Sorry, but I think Rivi is right and you can clearly see the Dino, so what's the problem. I saw many pictures like that, you always use the car of the combo to make your picture featured... Nothing wrong with that imo
Posted:  04/27/2013 12:17:24
 3 likes
Avatar
I know, but I was just using an example
Posted:  04/27/2013 12:01:54
 
Avatar
Andrew put a photo of a Shelby Cobra under "Ferrari F430" even though the main car was a Cobra, but there was an F430 in front of it, so I don't see why I can't do this even though you could clearly see the Dino. I'm not accusing Andrew of breaking the rules, I am not trying to drag him into this, and I think it is perfectly fine that he did that, so why can't I do the same?
Posted:  04/27/2013 11:58:35
 
Avatar
Please, place your photos in the category that the main car in the picture is. If the Dino were in front, and the Jag in the back, you wouldn't put it under XKR, would you?
Posted:  04/27/2013 11:56:01
 2 likes
Avatar
But it is clearly visible in this photo, so I will not change the category. And I don't know where the XKR came from. As far as I know, there are no Jaguar dealerships on West Putnam Avenue
Posted:  04/27/2013 11:46:59
 
Avatar
And not to mention that the XK-R looks like it's been recently purchased at a dealer.
Posted:  04/27/2013 11:36:19
 3 likes
Avatar
This isn't a Dino...

Stop abusing the "glitch." I see at least 5 of these daily.

*edit*

Didn't see the Dino in the background. Still, this doesn't need to be featured.
Posted:  04/27/2013 11:32:59
 5 likes
Avatar
Thing is: I didn't know there was a 246 Dino in the picture until I was editing it. Plus, I already posted a photo of that 246 Dino when it was on a different street
Posted:  04/27/2013 11:25:17
 
Avatar
Really dude? There's a Dino in the back, but you feature the main thing in the photo: an XK-R.
Posted:  04/27/2013 11:17:11
 2 likes
To post a comment, please login first