Ok, thanks for the feedback. From the jist of the thread I could tell that would be the most likely response. Unfortunately, I don't have the funds for a 24-70mm 2.8 or the like (unless you have a suggestion that is way cheaper than the price Nikon gives, which is like $1,800).
But, how would this match up? I know this has a higher minimum aperture, but this is way much more within my price range: http://www.nikonusa.com/en/nikon-products/product/camera-lenses/af-s-nikkor-24-85mm-f%252f3.5-4.5g-ed-vr.html
Last modified by
waddle2gracious, 13 March 2017, 05:12