Do you agree with my claim?
Yes
7
No
24
Total: 31
Rivitography, 17 October 2013, 18:07
r8lover wrote:
Rivitography wrote:
Alright, I admit that was a bad example, but what about this:
![[http://oi40.tinypic.com/epizwo.jpg]](http://oi40.tinypic.com/epizwo.jpg "http://oi40.tinypic.com/epizwo.jpg")
That's still illegal. Anything in the paddock is illegal, and that's an end of it.
Please give a valid reason on why they are illegal.
CTspotter458, 17 October 2013, 18:10
Rivitography wrote:
r8lover wrote:
Rivitography wrote:
Alright, I admit that was a bad example, but what about this:
That's still illegal. Anything in the paddock is illegal, and that's an end of it.
Please give a valid reason on why they are illegal.
exactly, i really hate how people dont give reasons
Rivitography, 17 October 2013, 18:13
CTspotter458 wrote:
Rivitography wrote:
r8lover wrote:
Rivitography wrote:
Alright, I admit that was a bad example, but what about this:
That's still illegal. Anything in the paddock is illegal, and that's an end of it.
Please give a valid reason on why they are illegal.
exactly, i really hate how people dont give reasons
You know, I'm starting to get the feeling nobody wants anybody to post paddock spots because people think those spots are better than anything else on the site.
CTspotter458, 17 October 2013, 18:22
Rivitography wrote:
CTspotter458 wrote:
Rivitography wrote:
r8lover wrote:
Rivitography wrote:
Alright, I admit that was a bad example, but what about this:
That's still illegal. Anything in the paddock is illegal, and that's an end of it.
Please give a valid reason on why they are illegal.
exactly, i really hate how people dont give reasons
You know, I'm starting to get the feeling nobody wants anybody to post paddock spots because people think those spots are better than anything else on the site.
i think they just dont understand because they were not there
r8lover, 17 October 2013, 18:24
CTspotter458 wrote:
Rivitography wrote:
CTspotter458 wrote:
Rivitography wrote:
Please give a valid reason on why they are illegal.
exactly, i really hate how people dont give reasons
You know, I'm starting to get the feeling nobody wants anybody to post paddock spots because people think those spots are better than anything else on the site.
i think they just dont understand because they were not there
For both of you, I have been to a racing paddock before, for your information. I was in the paddock for the Rolex Monterey Classics event at Laguna Seca. Nothing, and I mean NOTHING, I saw in that paddock looked like it could qualify as a spot.
Deleted account
CTspotter458, 17 October 2013, 18:26
r8lover wrote:
CTspotter458 wrote:
Rivitography wrote:
CTspotter458 wrote:
Rivitography wrote:
Please give a valid reason on why they are illegal.
exactly, i really hate how people dont give reasons
You know, I'm starting to get the feeling nobody wants anybody to post paddock spots because people think those spots are better than anything else on the site.
i think they just dont understand because they were not there
For both of you, I have been to a racing paddock before, for your information. I was in the paddock for the Rolex Monterey Classics event at Laguna Seca. Nothing, and I mean NOTHING, I saw in that paddock looked like it could qualify as a spot.
so you saw no cars that drivers could use for daily use since they cant drive the racers on the road???
Rivitography, 17 October 2013, 18:29
r8lover wrote:
CTspotter458 wrote:
Rivitography wrote:
CTspotter458 wrote:
Rivitography wrote:
Please give a valid reason on why they are illegal.
exactly, i really hate how people dont give reasons
You know, I'm starting to get the feeling nobody wants anybody to post paddock spots because people think those spots are better than anything else on the site.
i think they just dont understand because they were not there
For both of you, I have been to a racing paddock before, for your information. I was in the paddock for the Rolex Monterey Classics event at Laguna Seca. Nothing, and I mean NOTHING, I saw in that paddock looked like it could qualify as a spot.
Lime Rock Park is different. They put their daily drivers in the paddocks as well.
CTspotter458, 17 October 2013, 18:34
zonka-81 wrote:
I coulda said something really bad Jason, but i didnt
then why say tht?
r8lover, 17 October 2013, 18:35
Rivitography wrote:
Lime Rock Park is different. They put their daily drivers in the paddocks as well.
CTspotter458 wrote:
so you saw no cars that drivers could use for daily use since they cant drive the racers on the road???
You don't think I didn't see normal cars there too? I certainly did. The paddock also contained exotics not participating in the races too. Lime Rock Park is no different, the cars that were raced just weren't as special.
Deleted account
CTspotter458, 17 October 2013, 18:36
r8lover wrote:
Rivitography wrote:
Lime Rock Park is different. They put their daily drivers in the paddocks as well.
CTspotter458 wrote:
so you saw no cars that drivers could use for daily use since they cant drive the racers on the road???
You don't think I didn't see normal cars there too? I certainly did. The paddock also contained exotics not participating in the races too. Lime Rock Park is no different, the cars that were raced just weren't as special.
so why are those exotics not legit since they didnt participate
zonka-81, 17 October 2013, 18:39
CTspotter458 wrote:
r8lover wrote:
Rivitography wrote:
Lime Rock Park is different. They put their daily drivers in the paddocks as well.
CTspotter458 wrote:
so you saw no cars that drivers could use for daily use since they cant drive the racers on the road???
You don't think I didn't see normal cars there too? I certainly did. The paddock also contained exotics not participating in the races too. Lime Rock Park is no different, the cars that were raced just weren't as special.
so why are those exotics not legit since they didnt participate
IT DOESNT f**king MATTER IF THEY PARTICIPATED!!! YOU KNEW THERE WERE GONNA BE f**king EXOTICS THERE, SO ITS NOT LEGIT!!! i rest my case
Deleted account
Rivitography, 17 October 2013, 18:39
r8lover wrote:
Rivitography wrote:
Lime Rock Park is different. They put their daily drivers in the paddocks as well.
CTspotter458 wrote:
so you saw no cars that drivers could use for daily use since they cant drive the racers on the road???
You don't think I didn't see normal cars there too? I certainly did. The paddock also contained exotics not participating in the races too. Lime Rock Park is no different, the cars that were raced just weren't as special.
And also, as an addition to my previous post, I saw some of the cars coming in from the streets and into the paddocks, and out from the paddocks to the streets. I have photos of this. Also, I'm not joking about the daily driver part:
![[http://oi41.tinypic.com/24ou73b.jpg]](http://oi41.tinypic.com/24ou73b.jpg "http://oi41.tinypic.com/24ou73b.jpg")
r8lover, 17 October 2013, 18:40
CTspotter458 wrote:
so why are those exotics not legit since they didnt participate
For the reasons other people of said. Brian made a good point by saying you wouldn't be able to tell the photos apart form car show photos very easily.
Deleted account
