ok, at the risk of making myself look a bit of a plonker - i have just realised that a low rating is a good rating! that makes a lot more sense, but is not explained in the blog post! I got confused because the old system required a rating of more than 85 or something to get automatically uploaded. So in fact my rating has gone up, i was about 1800ish when the system came in and now im below 1000 - did anyone else have the same idea? I think you should put in the blog post about it that your rating is your position in the community.
^^I agree^^
Some good spotters/photogaphers don't comment anymore pictures of other guys.
Do they have their rating boosted because of that? Just wondering.
Btw, I know the answer: no.
I can't understand how NOT commenting can improve the rating.
Also, those who think they can like and favorite their own photos using another
account and get smth. significant out of it can give up with such a tricks.
I think what he's trying to say is that people won't comment on other people's photos because they don't want that person's rating to go up. I haven't seen that happening though.
Well, maybe. So, if they stop commenting, they stop improving someone's rating?
But maybe they stop improving their own as well by doing that? Why not, really?
Eventually everyone will understand that the only path to get a good rating
is through posting good spot photos.
What if I have a good photo just not many likes? Are likes and favorites a key factor?
Join our weekly update alert so you never miss out on pictures of the finest, most expensive, fastest, and most exciting exotic cars. You'll get alerted to...